#Judge judy full episodes 2010 series

Till the tenor of the show and the tone of the jurist change, “Judge Judy” is unlikely to win over the Emmy jury. The judge almost always overshadows the ordinary folk on her show with her biting personality and razor sharp wit.

“Judge Judy” typically features far less theatrical cases.Īnd the structure of “Judge Judy” allows for two or more cases to be shown which gives little screen time to the litigants. Other nominees in this category, such as “Cristina’s Court” and the popular “Judge Hatchett” starring Glenda Hatchett, have mastered the art of submitting episodes featuring just one sensational case with a compelling story arc. Winning submissions often include likeable participants to whom voters can relate. Judge Judy warns its owner, a mother of three, to.

#Judge judy full episodes 2010 series

Selecting an episode for Emmy consideration is a daunting task: one must find an example that non-regular viewers of the series can follow which also explains the format of the show and showcases its star. When a young boy is pushed into a pool against his will, the judge reprimands the parents for their bad judgment a woman sues her daughter for the return of a vehicle that was allegedly totaled and then damaged in a neighborhood shoot-out. And “Judge Judy” could be submitting the wrong episodes for consideration. Fairfield County Municipal Court Judge James Fields sentenced Parsley to 10. Many regard her to be overly harsh with the litigants appearing on her program. Jonathan Shuttlesworth, a televangelist who co-founded Revival Today TV. However, a far-less popular series - “Cristina’s Court” starring Latino-American judge Cristina Perez - pulled off a shocking victory in 2008, continued its winning streak in 2009, and even prevailed in 2010 despite being cancelled.īoth the charm and the curse of “Judge Judy” is the abrasive and divisive personality of its star Judge Judith Sheindlin. Rebel, which is seeking undisclosed damages, claims that “Judge Judy” has grossed $1.7 billion since it premiered in 1996, and that Rebel received regular payments for the show until 2010.The creation of the Legal/Courtroom show category was seen by Emmy watchers as a step towards crowning daytime’s top rated judge a winner. Lawrence in over 20 years to suggest that he had any involvement in my creating Hot Bench is equally laughable.” In her statement, Sheindlin added, “Since I have not spoken with Mr. The lawsuit also asserts that CBS was obligated to discuss a packaging fee with Rebel for any “Judge Judy” spinoffs, but did not do so before the launch of “Hot Bench,” a syndicated show created by Sheindlin.

Sheindlin is not named as a plaintiff in the suit, which also claims that CBS Studios, CBS Corp., and CBS-owned Big Ticket Entertainment cut Rebel out of potential profits “by licensing the show to CBS’s corporate affiliates - television stations owned or operated by CBS - for below-market fees in transactions that were not negotiated at arms-length.” The suit calls Sheindlin’s salary “grossly inconsistent with customary practice in the television industry.” Rebel Entertainment Partners’ successor-in-interest claims in the suit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, that in “the six-month accounting period after Scheindlin’s pay raise … defendants reported net profits of negative $3,195,217.” The suit also claims that “in the six-month accounting period prior to Scheindlin’s pay raise, the show reported net profits of $3,572,195, of which 5% ($178,609) was paid to Rebel.” Sheindlin renewed her deal with CBS in 2013 and signed an extension in 2015. 30m IMDb RATING 6.0 /10 5.3K YOUR RATING Rate POPULARITY 4,051 242 Comedy Crime Reality-TV Judge Judy Sheindlin, a former judge from New York, tackles actual, small claims cases with her no-nonsense attitude in which damages of no more than 5,000 can be awarded.